Glen in Japan Keynote

Cover

https://scrapbox.io/files/6595ff4c651e9800233de046.jpg

動画(Video)

切り出して字幕をつけつつある動画

スライド

memo

1: Slide Image

2: Japanese Translation from (3)

https://scrapbox.io/files/6595ff4c651e9800233de046.jpg

東京で皆さんと一緒にいることは素晴らしいことです。これまで素晴らしい時間を過ごしています。直近の5日間では、ほぼ半分しか寝られていません。また、時差ボケも12時間ありますので、どうか許していただければと思います。さて、私はこの「Plurality」プロジェクトについてお話ししたいと思います。こちらのスライドには、このプロジェクトを実現させているいくつかの人々がいます。世界中からこの共通のプロジェクトを築いているコミュニティです。

次のスライドへ進みます。

started it's it's great to be here with you guys in Tokyo I've been having an amazing time so far I've probably slept

about half of the time I should have slept for the last five nights uh on my way here and I'm jetlagged 12 hours so

forgive me for that but um I wanted to tell you guys all about this plurality project and um up here on the slide are

some of the people who are making this uh happen uh from all around the world uh a community of people building this

common project um and uh the symbol for

it uh which I guess they they showed over there as well um has a lot of

things loaded into it so the word plurality uh originates from the uh fact

that these two symbols that you can barely see in traditional Mandarin I don't know if they also have those in

kanji um but these mean in in in Taiwan both plural and digital and plurality is

the attempt to render into English this uh sort of joining of technology and uh

social philosophy um and the symbols are also a Unicode character so you can now have a

an emoji that represents plurality uh which is these overlapping squares um in

this detailed you know one is Circ circles the other is squares and they give birth to this rounded square and

plurality is really all about that plurality is about cooperation across difference and how by bringing people

together across differences we can create uh Beauty and progress and

growth um anyway I won't tell you who all these people are you probably recognize some of them uh others

hopefully you'll come to recognize in coming years

um okay next slide um so uh

https://scrapbox.io/files/65a4a38f11d2190023eb1902.jpg

plurality addresses the fact that technology and democracy are kind of on a collision course right now in most of

the world so you read all over the place about how technology is undermining uh

democratic governments by uh creating extremism creating silos and uh and

divisions and um polarization and spreading

misinformation and at the same time I think it's important we also acknowledge that many people in the tech World feel

uh Democratic World Focus overwhelmingly on restricting uh regulating prohibiting

uh the development of certain Technologies and that the government uh of governments of democratic countries

which used to invest huge amounts of resources in developing technologies have increasingly left the development

of Technologies to the private sector the the percentage of national income that Democratic countries are putting in

building giant cities to accommodate drug lless cars uh and and really thinking about the future in this

proactive way next slide

https://scrapbox.io/files/6595ff54a8350a00234a029f.jpg

私が大学に通っていた頃、生徒会長に立候補した男がいた。

彼は楽しく盛り上げ、アルコールを流し続け、面倒な仕事は別のやつにやらせるって言ったんだ

だからこれは分断なんだ......みんなで楽しくやって、機械がそれを管理するみたいな......

だけど僕らは別のイデオロギーがあると思うんだ......別のビジョンが......民主主義に沿ったもので、それは

しかし、私たちは、別のイデオロギー、別のビジョンがあると考えています。

民主主義と調和するものです。

that actually underlies more more of the Technologies we have things like the internet and personal computers

インターネットやパソコンのようなテクノロジーの根底にあるものだ。

ポップカルチャーのビジョン、例えばスタートレックのようなもの、哲学のようなものも含まれており、私たちはこれらのことを考えるときにこれらのことを考えています。

articulated

= put in words

テクノロジーの未来を考えるとき、私たちはこうしたもの(SF)を思い浮かべます。

そして、これらのビジョンに向かって建設を進めてきた

これらは非常に反民主主義的であり、過度な資本主義的または過度に中央集権的である

民主主義は多様性、ネットワーク、参加に関するものであるため、民主主義とテクノロジーの間での対立につながっています。

and our vision is that the reason this is happening is

re fundamentally anti-democratic in

character and um these two visions uh are kind of both visions of technology

and political Visions one of these uh we call corporate libertarianism um and this is associated

with people like Mark andreon Peter the B Serena Boston it's a vision that is

about sort of the individual um it's a vision that's about technology as a way to get around and

break down social organization um replacing trust with

with algorithms um and you know its favorite Technologies are like the crypto Suite

of Technologies privacy oriented things Etc another vision is what we call

synthetic technocracy um these terms by the way are derived from the game civilization 6

which I don't know if any of you have played it's the bestselling strategy game of all time and in it there are future governments and these are the

three future governments and they were derived from this discussion so another ideology is is associated with people

like Sam Alton Reed Hoffman the AI World Universal basic income this whole thing it's like we're going to make some giant

machine it will do everything for you and then you can all you know just party you know that's kind of the vision of it

uh when I was in uh college there was a guy who ran for uh the president of the

student council the you know student government and he said uh let the good

times Ro keep the good times rolling and the good stuff like alcohol flowing

while all the hard work is done by this guy whose name was smolen um and so the

this is division it's like we all have fun and the machine manages it you know

um but we think that there's another ideology another Vision uh that is

aligned with democracy um and that

actually pop cultural Visions like Star Trek articulated as well as a philosophy

and so we think of these things when we think the future of technology and people have been building towards those as a result and because these are very

anti-democratic they're either hyper capitalist or hyper centralized whereas democracy is about diversity and and

networks and participation we therefore have gotten into this conflict between democracy and Technology

next slide

https://scrapbox.io/files/65a4a39620f22c0023a29037.jpg

しかし、それとは異なる場所があります。それはここからあまり遠くない島があり、民主主義とテクノロジーが手を組み、市民技術運動が民間セクターや国家だけでなく、テクノロジーの発展を前進させた場所です。

それを使って、最も技術集約的な経済成長を達成し、実際に時間と所得の資本割合を減少させた世界で最も優れたパフォーマンスを発揮しています。

COVID19への対応で世界最高の実績を上げ、最も技術集約的な経済成長を遂げるために、彼らはそれを利用した。

その結果、長期にわたって不平等が縮小し、所得に占める資本の割合が減少した。

民間セクターは政府をハッキングし、政府のサービスの品質を持続的に向上させ、

政府の許可を求めずにだ

政府はこれらのことを追求し、取り入れています。

汚染対策と情報風景の汚染に対する世界一のパフォーマンスを発揮している場所で、大規模な敵が市民や普通の人々の関与を通じて情報風景を汚染しています。

but there's a place where that's not what's happening there's an island not so far

from here um where uh democracy and

Technology have worked hand inand where um Civic technology movement has pushed

forward technology development rather than just the private sector or the state where

they've used it to have the world's best performance in addressing Co to have the most technology intensive economic growth and in a way that's actually reduced inequality over time and reduced Capital share of income um a

place where uh the the Civil SE sector has hacked the government and

continually upgraded the quality of government services without asking permission from the government to do it

and the government follows and incorporates these things um

we're they're having the best in the world

performance on addressing pollution and the uh and the pollution of the information landscape by a large

adversary using the involvement of the public and uh uh Ordinary People

next slide

https://scrapbox.io/files/65a4a3998dfa38002276b2ee.jpg

これらの人々は24倍以上、100倍以上、3週間以上も国立議会を占拠し、台湾にとってはどれほどのトラウマだったでしょうか。

しかし、彼らはこれらのツールを使って合意を築く方法を見つけ、プログラムを明確にし、対立する党に採択させ、その後、対立する党はこの運動の人々を政府のメンターとして招聘し、その後、彼女は国のデジタル大臣となりました。

これは、私たちがこれらの種類のツールを使用してトラウマの瞬間から社会的変化と社会的合意を構築できる例です。明らかに、彼女は地道にこの仕事に取り組んでおり、それを明確にしようとしています。

このトラウマは"An event that causes great distress."の意味かな

2014年に立法院を占拠した（ひまわり学生運動）

これこそが このようなツールを使えば、トラウマの瞬間から社会的コンセンサスを築くことができる。彼女は現場で懸命にこれらのことに取り組んできた。

this was made uh possible by among others uh a collaborator of mine Audrey Tang uh the first

transgender minister in the world um who in the wake of the occupation of their

National legislature in 2014 think about that January 6 in the United States they

came in to the National legislature for 3 hours think of what a trauma that was

for the country these people were 24 times as long uh more than that uh uh more than

100 times as long three weeks they occupy the national legislature how Trump atic that was for Taiwan and yet

using these tools they found a way to build consensus to get a

program articulated and adopted by the oppos opposite party and then the opposite party

brought in the people from this movement as mentors reverse mentors to the government and then they were voted out

and she became the digital minister of the country so that is the sort of

social change social consensus that we can build from moments of trauma if we use these types of tools now obviously

she's been working very hard on the ground doing these things and she's also tried to articulate them

next slide

https://scrapbox.io/files/65a4a39c8c2a1c002306ab39.jpg

彼女は散文よりも詩を書くことが多い。これが彼女の仕事内容だ。

she said that she wrote for herself

when we see the internet of things let's make it an internet of beings when we see

virtual reality let's make it a shared reality when we see machine learning

let's make it Collaborative Learning when we see user experience let's make it about The Human

Experience and whenever we hear that the singularity is near let us remember the

plurality is here

next slide

https://scrapbox.io/files/65a4a39ec7fb9d002474cf5f.jpg

もちろん、行動は素晴らしいし、詩も素晴らしいですが、人々には文章も必要です。

手に取って読むことができる具体的なもの、それを使って何かをする、構築する、拡張することができるものが必要です。

そのため、私たちは世界中の数百人の人々と一緒にこの本を執筆しています。

そして、6月には繁体字中国語版と簡体字中国語版が印刷され、英語版も同様に発売されます。そして、あなたの協力を得て、日本語版もその後間もなく発売されることを期待しています。

but of course action is amazing poetry is amazing but people also need Prose they

need things to put their hands on and grab so that they can do and build and

extend and so that's why we're writing this book together along with hundreds of people around the world um plurality

the future of collaborative uh technology and democracy it will be digitally finalized in March and thanks

to the incredible work of our friend Akinori here and many others in the community will be available it's already

available many of the most of the chapters uh to people around the world and then it will come out in print in uh

traditional Mandarin uh and simplified Mandarin in June and in English in June

and hopefully with your help in Japanese not uh far thereafter

next slide

https://scrapbox.io/files/65a4a3a120f22c0023a2921f.jpg

so what is plurality um the definition is technology to facilitate

collaboration across social difference so this is very much inspired

by this idea from Star Trek so uh in Star Trek uh the Vulcans uh who Audrey

very much identifies with have a philosophy that they call infinite diversity and infinite comp ation this

is the idea that all truth beauty and progress come from the union of things

that are different so this is symbolized here by a triangle uniting with a circle and

giving birth to a a diamond of light um and uh this to be a little bit more uh

pedantic about it

next slide

https://scrapbox.io/files/65a4a3a45fab0500231066e3.jpg

具体的に何を意味するかというと、これには熱力学とエネルギーがどのように機能するかという点で直接的で密接な類似性があるのです。

例えば、油やウランなどの物質が強力である理由は、

すべてが非常に高温なら、多くのエネルギーがあるかもしれませんが、それは強力ではありません。

実際には、物事を分離しており、何かがここで熱いところにあり、別の場所で冷たいところにある場合、強力な作業ができるのです。

何かが反応したいけれども、それを反応させず、反応を制御するのです。

そして、それが危険な場合もあります。

ウランは分裂し、爆発する可能性がありますし、油は爆発して燃えることもあります。

しかし、それはまた、強力な作業に燃料を供給することもできます。

多様性、社会的多様性も同じです。それが紛争を引き起こすことも、戦争や極端な対立を生むこともあるかもしれませんが、新しいものを生み出し、イノベーションや進歩、成長をもたらすこともできるのです。

それがダニエル・アレンが提唱した重要なアイデアであり、私たちは、多様性を活かすために政治を組織する方法を考えるべきだということです。

最後に、オードリーが2016年に述べたことは、デジタルテクノロジーの中心的な役割は、我々がこれをより良く活用し、未来のエンジンを構築し、より効率的で安全な多様性の活用エンジンを構築することであるべきだということです。

um you can think of this idea

as coming from three great thinkers um so Hana arent one of the

great uh uh philosophers of the 20th century used the word plurality in her

book The Human Condition to represent this idea that the world is made up of diverse and intersecting social groups

not of individuals and society as a whole that is fundamentally we should

think of things in terms of networks or hyper RS would be the the technical way

to put it rather than in terms of you know isolated individuals and then the society as a whole second Danielle Allen

uh who I have a paper with that just came out yesterday uh encourage you to take a look at it it's in the Journal of

democracy um and it uh it she in her uh

paper on towards connected Society built on this idea from arent to propose sort of a fundamental idea of political

philosophy which is that the engine driving societies forward is

collaboration across social diversity and that diversity is the fuel for that engine so what do I mean by this there

there's actually a very direct and tight analogy here to thermodynamics and how

energy actually works so if you think about what is it that is powerful about oil or about uranium or any of these

things it's that they're in a low entropy state it's not that they have energy if

everything was just very hot it would have a lot of energy that's not powerful what what

actually does work is when you have things separated when something's hot here and cold here when you have

something that wants to react but you stop it from reacting and then you control the reaction and of course whenever that's the case it's dangerous

right uranium can fision bomb oil can explode and burn but it can also fuel

power powerful work right and diversity social

diversity is the same thing that's the key idea behind this social diversity yes it can cause conflict it can cause

War it can cause polarization but it can also produce new things it can produce

Innovation and progress and growth and that is the key idea that Daniel Allen

proposed is that we should think about organizing politics of around how do we

harness yes avoid the explosion but more importantly harness for Progress social

diversity and finally what Audrey said in 2016 is that the central role of

digital technology should be precisely to facilitate allowing us to do that

better to harness to to build the engines of the future the more efficient

engines the more safe engines of harnessing diversity for for Progress

okay next slide

https://scrapbox.io/files/65a4a3a756ff3f0025808ef5.jpg

それでは、それをどのように実現するのか、基本的なアイデアは民主主義が機能する方法とオペレーティングシステムが機能する方法との間に強力な類似性があるという点を利用するということです。自由民主主義の背後にある基本的なアイデアは、人々が持つ基本的な権利があるということで、これが民主主義が存在するための条件です。個々の人々がいないと、個々の人々がいないという概念がない場合、投票権がどのように成立するかはわかりません。投票は基本的に人数を数えることですから、人々が個別の存在でないと投票はできないのです。したがって、人格と人の尊重の概念が必要です。そうでなければ、民主主義は存在できません。人々がグループや政党、団体を形成し、共同で行動することができないと、民主主義は成り立たないのです。民主主義はこの基本的な権利に基づいており、同様に、コンピュータのすべてのアプリケーションは、共通のコードと前提条件を持つオペレーティングシステムに依存しています。そして、それらのアプリケーションはそれらの要素を利用して構築され、それらから派生しています。

インターネットが共有のプロトコルのセットとして想定された方法を考えてみると、

それが基本的にオペレーティングシステムと権利のアイデアの完璧な融合であることがわかります。これは、デジタル世界での私たちのすべての社会的相互作用が依存できる基盤としての、これらのアフォーダンスの基盤です。

しかし、これまでのところ、それはコミュニケーションプロトコルやパケットスイッチング、おそらくハイパーテキストなどに限られており、

インターネットの創設者たちのビジョンでは、これがさらに進化し、民主主義と多様性を促進する様々な要素、アイデンティティの技術、プライバシー、団結、財産と契約、資産の共有、オンライン世界での商取引、支払いなど、すべてを包括するものになるべきだと考えていました。

the founders

of the internet like jcr Li later was that this would extend much further that this would come to Encompass the full

sets of things that empower democracy and collaboration across diversity identity Technologies of

privacy and Association of property and contract and asset sharing on in the

online world and of Commerce and payments and so forth and so we believe

したがって、デジタル時代における異なる要素間の協力を可能にする基盤は、インターネットプロトコルのより野心的なビジョンを持つことです。共有可能で相互運用性のあるオープンなプロトコルを構築し、それによってより豊かなプロパティのセットを可能にします。現在のインターネットの基盤に組み込まれているものよりも。

so how do we do that well we

there's there's this powerful analogy between the way that democracies work and the way that operating systems work

that we want to draw on so the basic fundamental idea behind liberal democracy is that there are these

fundamental rights that people have that allow for a democracy to exist if we

can't if you can't know that there are individual people then how can you have voting

right if there's no notion of separate people you can't vote because voting is counting up people right so you need to

have a notion of personhood and the the sanctity of the person or there's no way

that democracy can exist you can't without um people being

able to form groups and political parties and associations people can't act together to achieve things you can't

have democracy without that right so democracy is grounded on these fundamental rights and in the same way

all applications of computers rely on an operating system that's a common

underlying base of code and assumptions that you have to build those

applications on and they draw on those things and if you think about the way that the internet was imagined as the

shared set of protocols that we have fundamentally that's a perfect Fusion of

the operating system and the idea of Rights it's this underlying set of affordances that all of our social

interactions in the digital world can rely upon but so far that's only for

like communication protocols and packet switching and maybe hypertext and things like this and the vision of the founders

of the internet like jcr Li later was that this would extend much further that this would come to Encompass the full

sets of things that empower democracy and collaboration across diversity identity Technologies of

privacy and Association of property and contract and asset sharing on in the

online world and of Commerce and payments and so forth and so we believe

that the foundation of allowing cooperation AC cross difference in the digital age is to have this much more

ambitious vision of what internet Protocols are to build open protocols that are shared and inter operable that

Empower this richer set of uh of properties than we've currently built

into the internet Bas layer and then on top of that

next slide

https://scrapbox.io/files/65a4a3aa2681cd00247bc2f0.jpg

異なる要素間での協力には、協力が深まるほど到達できる人々が少なくなるというトレードオフが内在しています。

つまり、最も似ている人々と最も深いつながりを持つか、少なくとも一握りの人々と深いつながりを持つ場合、最も多くの人々に到達するものは最も基本的な協力形態であるということです。

現在、親密さと資本主義の間にスペクトルが存在しており、資本主義はほぼ全世界のほとんどの人々をつなげていますが、非常に浅い関係、つまりお金や非常に商業的な関係のようなものです。一方、親密さは非常に深いものであり、通常、親密な関係に参加しているのはわずかな人々です。

参加する人々の数と、彼らが共有する情報の豊かさを考えることができます。

資本主義では、金額のようなものです。

投票は意見のベクトルのようなもので、異なるものについて持っている意見を示すものです。組織には異なるものがあり、構造化された言語、法律など、自然言語の会話があります。そして、映画を見るような場合の単感覚の没入感があります。多感覚の没入感があります。

親密な関係では、これを誰かと共有し始めるものです。

プラリティは、これらの要素間のトレードオフを後退させ、より深く、より広く共有できるようにすることに関するものであり、

このトレードオフを削減します。たとえば、私たちが多くの人々と持つことができるようにすること、そして社会的関係を考慮に入れるマーケットを持つこと、また、脳コンピュータインターフェースなどのテクノロジーを使用してお互いに思考を共有できるようにすることを可能にします。社会的テクノロジーから脳コンピュータインターフェース、AIなど、これらすべてのテクノロジーは、この深さと広がりのトレードオフを後退させるという目標に沿った異なるポイントとして考えることができます。

on top of that we can build this broad range of applications of cooperation across difference

we can build this broad range of applications of cooperation across difference so what do I mean by applications

so there's a tradeoff inherent in cooperation across difference because the deeper you

cooperate with someone the fewer people that that can reach right

you have the richest deepest connections with people who are most similar to you or at least a small number of people

and on the other hand the things that reach the most people are the thinnest the most basic forms of cooperation

and so one way we can see that is at present there's this spectrum between like intimacy on the one hand and capitalism on the other hand capitalism connects every almost everyone on the planet and yet it's very thin it's like money and

these very commercial relationships and then intimacy is this very very deep thing but usually it's just a couple of

people who are participating in an intimate relationship right and

you can in fact quantify this you can think

about the number of people who are participating versus the richness of the information they share so when in in

capitalism it's like this dollar amount right or Yen amount right so it's a it's a scaler um

voting is more like a vector of opinions you have on different things and in different organizations um

then there's structured language like laws and and things like this natural language in conversation

and then

there's unisensory immersion like you would have if you see like a film

there's multisensory immersion like if you're at a party

and then there's you know propri exception your internal

feeling of yourself so propri exception is the idea like if you close your eyes and stick out your arm you know that

your arm is out even though none of your senses tell you that it's not sight smell taste but it's the internal sense

of yourself and in an intimate relationship it's that thing that you begin to start to share with someone

right and what plurality is all about is pushing back the trade-off between these things allowing us to share more deeply

more broadly

reducing that tradeoff and so for example it's about making us able to have this type of conversation a that I hope we'll all have but with many more people or it's allowing us to have markets that take into account our social relationships or it's allowing us to go from our intimate relationships to ones where we can actually telepathically share with each other using things like brain computer interface so all those types of Technologies from the social Technologies to you know brain computer interface AI all these things can be thought of as different points along this spectrum in this goal of pushing out the trade-off between depth and

breadth of collaboration

next slide

https://scrapbox.io/files/65a4a3ada62c5f002419a368.jpg

私たちは、これらのさまざまな領域を変革できると考えています。これは、民主主義について話していますが、公共セクターだけでなく、人生のあらゆる部分に関するものです。職場において、リモートワークが私たちをチームに強力に結びつける方法、企業を階層的にしないで人々がネットワークを形成し、異なる方法で協力できるようにする方法、これについてです。メディアを再構想すること、異なる人々と共感するための強力な方法を持つこと、人々を分断するのではなく結びつけるためのメディアの資金提供方法、環境に関すること、健康に関すること、エネルギーシステムに関すること、教育と学習に関すること、これらすべての領域で、これらのテクノロジーが変革に役立つと考えています。

um and we think that this range of

things can transform so many domains of human life this is you know we talk

about democracy but this is about every part of life not just the

public sector this is about the workplace how we have remote work that

is really connects us uh powerfully to our teams how we organize companies in

ways that don't have to be hierarchical but can instead allow people to form networks and collaborate differently

this is about reimagining the media um by having more powerful ways to

empathize with people across Difference by having um ways of uh funding the

media that support bridging people rather than dividing them this is about the environment this is about health

this is about um the energy systems this is about education and learning all of

these domains we believe that these Technologies can can help transform

next slide

https://scrapbox.io/files/65a4a3b0c58da80024776047.jpg

それを実現するためには、元のインターネットを構築するために使用された教訓を活用する必要があります。私たちは、私たちの技術の進歩のエンジンとして私企業部門を考えることに慣れていますが、インターネットは政府の支援、市民と学術部門の関与、および主要なスケーリング役割での私企業部門の統合によって構築されました。ただし、プライベートセクターだけが全体のアジェンダを駆動しているわけではありません。

台湾でのAudreyの取り組みのように、デジタル省が国をまたいでデジタルな公共インフラストラクチャに協力するなど、政府のサポートと連携が可能です。

um and to do that we need to draw

on the lessons that were used to build the original internet we're used to thinking of the private sector as the

engine of technological progress but the internet was built by the support of governments by the engagement of the the

civil and academic sector and with the integration in key scaling roles of the

private sector but not just the private sector driving the whole agenda and um

that is uh possible today with work like what Audrey's been doing in Taiwan with

digital Ministries collaborating across countries on digital public

infrastructure um and to mik Tillman who is one of the top advisers to uh vice

president presid Biden um when he was vice president is uh writing the chapter

that we're doing about all these policy issues and at the same time it's just announced he's leading one of the largest philanthropic efforts in the

world around decentralization project Liberty uh by Frank mcord in the United States so

next slide

https://scrapbox.io/files/65a4a3b311c94f00255dccae.jpg

um and we need people from all sectors to participate and contribute we

have a Oscar winning documentary filmmaker coming to taipe with us next week to make a movie about Audrey Tong's

life and to tell this story to bring it home to people all around the world there are legislator around the world

implementing quadratic voting to make decisions and resolve their issues um

yeah um great and uh there are um there

are technology uh companies like anthropic writing their constitutions using ideas

like this there are academics organizing around this like plurality Institute

next slide

https://scrapbox.io/files/65a4a3b7491952002494c692.jpg

そしてこの本自体が参加型の方法で執筆されており、多くの方々に参加していただきたいと思います。

これはオープンな公共の本で、著作権はありません。

すべてはGitHub上にあり、誰でもプルリクエストを作成し、コミュニティの一部となることができます。

すべての貢献は、クレジットされます。

お金ではなく、コミュニティ通貨でクレジットされ、プロジェクトを統治し、制御することができます。

and uh the book itself is

being written in a participatory way and I hope many of you will join in Us in in doing this uh it's an open public book

it's no copyrights everything is on get anyone can make a PR and become part of

the community and all contributions will be credited uh formally like in a dow

but not with money instead with Community currency that allows you to govern and and control the project

next slide

https://scrapbox.io/files/65a4a3ba52e3bb0025e15729.jpg

using something that we call the plural management protocol and again I'm running low in time so I'll skip over

this a little bit

next slide

https://scrapbox.io/files/65a4a3bd367e350023c2709c.jpg

um but I hope many of you will join in that will'll contribute to the base text

we'll contribute to the translation and Japanese that nishio is leading

私はベースとなるテキストや翻訳に多くの人が参加してくれることを期待している。

next slide

https://scrapbox.io/files/65a4a3c0d1f89900246b0a03.jpg

これは本の中から様々なメカニズムを使用していますので、本のアイデアを示す方法として本を構築しています。本の多くのアイデアは、本の構築方法を通じて説明されます。

this uses all kinds of the mechanisms from the book so we're building the book in a way that illustrates the book's ideas many of the book's ideas are going to be Illustrated through the way the book is built

next slide

https://scrapbox.io/files/65a4a3c54a1a7c00249364ac.jpg

そして、皆さんが参加してくれることを願っています。ウェブサイトへのリンクは、そのQRコードを通じて入手できます。ありがとうございます。

and so I hope you'll join us

you can get a link to the website uh through that QR code

thank you so much